District report card · CMAS 2024–2026

Hanover 28Draft

Small rural district · about 95 students tested a year in grades 3–8 · 249 students in district-run schools (K–12)
−15.8
points vs. what its
demographics predict

Based on its families’ demographics, Hanover 28 would be expected to rank #66 of 105 Colorado districts, with 35% of students meeting or exceeding expectations in English and 26% in math. It actually ranks #101, with 20% and 9%. That is 15.8 percentage points below what its demographics predict, which ranks it #100 of 105 on performance vs. demographics.

#100 of 105 statewide · likely #95–#103#32 of 35 small districts#43 of 46 rural districts#8 of 9 among its most similar districts

Where demographics would place it, and where it lands

Statewide rank, English and math combined
Hollow: predicted from demographics. Filled: actual results. #1 is the highest share of students meeting expectations.
#1 (best)#25#50#75#105Predicted #66Actual #101
SubjectExpectedActualOver/under (pts)Rank: predicted → actualRank vs. demographics
English35%20%−15.2 ±3.9#68 → #101#100
Math26%9%−16.5 ±2.9#68 → #101#99

Met or exceeded expectations on CMAS, grades 3–8, 2024–2026 combined. District results include district-run neighborhood, choice and magnet schools, but not charter or online schools. ± is a 90% range for normal year-to-year swings.

Over time

Met or exceeded expectations, by year
Dashed: expected from demographics.
0%10%20%30%40%50%202420252026English 18%Math 8%
Growth
CDE median growth percentile, 2024–2026: how much students improved compared with students statewide who started at the same level. 50 is typical.
English growth
51
median growth percentile
Math growth
36
median growth percentile

Growth depends much less on family background than test scores do, so it is the closer measure of what schools add in a given year.

Compared with its most similar districts

Over/under, percentage points (English and math)
The eight districts closest on parents’ education, free/reduced lunch, English learners, special education and size. Blue: above prediction; red: below; gray: within normal swings. Lines: 90% range.
Big Sandy 100J+17.1Wray RD-2+14.9Norwood R-2J+5.0Yuma 1+3.8Holyoke Re-1J−6.5Ellicott 22−7.5Ignacio 11 JT−15.6Hanover 28−15.8Crowley County RE-1-J−16.4

Who it serves

The measures behind the prediction
Bars: this district. Black tick: Colorado average across ranked districts, weighted by students.
Parents with a bachelor’s degree+30%Free/reduced-price lunch68%English learners15%Students with IEPs15%

Parents’ education: parents of public-school children (Census ACS 2019–2023, NCES tabulation). For context, not in the prediction: all adults with a bachelor’s degree+ 27%; median household income $102,708.

Its schools

Neighborhood schools
Compared with Colorado schools serving similar students (income and education of the area, free/reduced lunch, English learners, special education). Points are CMAS scale-score points vs. expected, 2024–2026.
SchoolMet/exceeded
Eng / Math
Vs. expected
English
Vs. expected
Math
Growth
Hanover Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–528% / 14%−11.9−18.636
Hanover Junior-Senior High SchoolMiddle · grades 6–830% / —−5.2−14.353

How to read this

The expected result comes from a statistical model fit across all ranked Colorado districts: parents’ education, free/reduced lunch, English learners and special education explain about 90% of the differences in district results. Over/under is what remains — the part the demographics don’t account for, which includes the schools themselves but also anything else those measures miss. Each district’s expected value is predicted from the other districts. Full method and caveats.